tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post8775212797772652845..comments2024-01-03T09:45:22.238-05:00Comments on GyllenBabble: Monday MondayUltraViolethttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09067526049573049270noreply@blogger.comBlogger112125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-62496106541496273372009-12-10T02:00:04.673-05:002009-12-10T02:00:04.673-05:00New post :)New post :)UltraViolethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09067526049573049270noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-32659661819064254082009-12-09T21:04:03.008-05:002009-12-09T21:04:03.008-05:00Well, we will know soon enough. all this nonsense ...Well, we will know soon enough. all this nonsense is giving me heartburn! (It couldn't be the vegan chili with 17,000 different kinds of peppers and about a kazillion ounces of chili powder!)<br /><br />OT:<br />Jude LW is going to select the next recipient of the Heath Ledger acting scholarship in Australia. <br /><br />Terry Gilliam has chosen Robert Duvall for his Don Quixote movie, and there's a sweet video clip somewhere of Jeff Bridges and Colin Farrell singing at a country western concert in Crazy Heart. <br /><br />Everyone is saying that Jeff Bridges gives the performance of his life! I didn't realize he's been nominated for an Oscar four times! Maggie was showered with praise for her performance as well. T Bone Burnett, who was music director for Walk the Line, did Crazy Heart.bobbyannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-20722302122259268252009-12-09T20:15:38.999-05:002009-12-09T20:15:38.999-05:00It's possible (and I suspect it's what wil...It's possible (and I suspect it's what will be spun by People Mag when all is said and done) that something happened between them. Stuff happens all the time between couples. Maybe they fought. Maybe they had even broken up. Then, they got back together and didn't think it was a big deal.<br /><br />But I think that People went to press with a story they didn't know the full extent of and now they're fishing for answers. Jake and Reese seem uninterested in playing their little games. <br /><br />I still think there is far more evidence to suggest that they're still together than they broke up.<br /><br />Let's be honest, if this weren't People Magazine and was Life and Style, all other things being equal, no one would even have thought twice about it.Think About Itnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-27534387524436173302009-12-09T20:09:26.804-05:002009-12-09T20:09:26.804-05:00People Magazine has already said that their source...People Magazine has already said that their source was someone "unofficial" who had heard from someone else at that Thanksgiving party that she had said they were broken up.Think About Itnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-55808246837915151362009-12-09T19:56:56.151-05:002009-12-09T19:56:56.151-05:00That makes no sense, why would she leak it before ...That makes no sense, why would she leak it before she went to the UK and he had press to do? There was no indication that there was any thing wrong, all they both had to do to avoid any personal questions was to ask the interviewer before hand, end of story.<br /><br />If there was a break up, then it would just be issued the week after, there was no reason to leak anything prematurely, it's not done that way.<br /><br />If anyone remembers back in 2007, there were about a month of break-up rumors in the lesser rags, it wasn't until June 2007, that People declared that they had broke-up. If i recall, a statement wasn't issued by their reps, but several "friends" that sited that it was too soon for her and that they would never get back together and are still friends.<br /><br />This time they site one source and with no explanation (they later spun a reason based mostly stories they did on them in 2007).<br /><br />The difference then: A reason and no denial from their reps, now: No reason at first and denials. Could it be the source this time was the same source as 2007, that's why they didn't question it? And could that source be someone associated with BWR, their PR Co? And did this person give them correct info, or was it just a rumor? A fight maybe blown up?<br /><br />Geez, I can't wait to go and see Brothers on Saturday, enough with the tabloid crap.Sheba babynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-13165967424658760972009-12-09T19:55:02.634-05:002009-12-09T19:55:02.634-05:00If Jake or Reese goes out socially,it's imposs...If Jake or Reese goes out socially,it's impossible to think that some friend or acquaintance wouldn't ask them how the other one's doing. Time will definitely tell. No point to worry.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-78961402654301831972009-12-09T19:35:27.505-05:002009-12-09T19:35:27.505-05:00Pretty obvious Reese's people caused the "...Pretty obvious Reese's people caused the "premature" leak. After all, she was going to the UK crusading against domestic abuse for Avon.He was finished shooting, had all that press to do, so she was sure it might come up, especially by her being out of the country.<br /><br />His people were real upset.That's why the joint denials & that's why she looked all pale in London. Maybe she felt guilty. What ever happens, I wish only the best for Jake. He is such a sweet guy!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-78885638090281534672009-12-09T19:27:16.803-05:002009-12-09T19:27:16.803-05:00bobbyanna is 100% right.
People Magazine is fishi...bobbyanna is 100% right.<br /><br />People Magazine is fishing for a story, not reporting one. <br /><br />They were the ones who everyone quoted when they said they were broken up, if it turns out to not be true (which I strongly suspect it isn't) then they're going to look like major-league assholes. <br /><br />Sure the people who always hated them together are out in full force praying/hoping that the break up was true, but they don't matter. <br /><br />In the end, Christmas/Jake's birthday/awards season/etc. is all coming up and we're going to know for sure one way or another, sooner instead of later. <br /><br />But I think People Magazine is just trying to get ahead of the story now and if/when they do show up somewhere together People Magazine are just going to say "Oh, they were broken up but have now worked things out."<br /><br />This is about People Magazine saving face.<br /><br />After all, obviously People Magazine is all over this story, yet they have not found a second source to confirm what their first source told them. <br /><br />That's pretty strange, and telling.Think About Itnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-39501386690290180212009-12-09T19:23:42.090-05:002009-12-09T19:23:42.090-05:00"...they need to find out who it is and find ..."...they need to find out who it is and find out why they would do something like that the week his movie was opening, it makes no sense and seems very unprofessional."<br /><br />I absolutely agree with this!bobbyannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-12082943011348117692009-12-09T19:20:24.794-05:002009-12-09T19:20:24.794-05:00People Magazine's pushing because they have so...People Magazine's pushing because they have something to prove. They looked stupid for what might have been an accurate but premature leak. Rep denials, etc. obviously made them angry.<br /><br />R&J haven't been seen together in weeks. People Mag will keep on pushing to force some kind of confirmation or denial with more details. R&J are under a microscope right now. People wants a story,even if they have to invent most of it. <br /><br />The social season's starting,<br />CAA party,Christmas parties, awards season, etc.It'll be hard to avoid talk if they keep showing up solo. The explanation that Reese went to a special screening at CAA sounds really lame.<br /><br />Anon 6:59, if you're referring to Ryan, he was her husband for almost eight years. They had two kids together. It was a different situation.<br /><br />I think I agree with Anon 6:28.bobbyannanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-85115258583373708592009-12-09T19:13:52.540-05:002009-12-09T19:13:52.540-05:00They're definitely still together.
They just...They're definitely still together. <br /><br />They just haven't been in the same city until this past weekend. There were still the bi-weekly visits, but he was filming in Pittsburg until last Tuesday and she was in London last Monday to Thursday. <br /><br />I imagine the reason they didn't show up to Maggie's premiere together (asides from the fact that they have yet to show up together at a premiere together) is that they probably didn't want to show Maggie up. <br /><br />After all, the obvious question is: why would she go to see Maggie's movie at all if they weren't together? <br /><br />I agree with the poster above, People Magazine is hedging their bets now. If you read what they write closely, they don't seem so sure. They went from being definite about it, to qualifying their position by saying "a source" told us (as in A SINGLE SOURCE). This means, in more than a week since they "reported" on this story, they have not found another source to confirm their original (hence the hedges). If anything, a second source told them that they hadn't "broken up" at all. <br /><br />They're still together, don't worry.Think About Itnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-85803159906804193302009-12-09T19:09:34.137-05:002009-12-09T19:09:34.137-05:00I thought the same thing when I first heard, but w...I thought the same thing when I first heard, but when both reps. denied it than I said ok, they got bad info. But People have been going back and forth on it like they are sure,and they usually don't stick with a story unless they were sure, well they used to any way. <br /><br />They usually either get their info directly from the reps., not "friends" or "sources" but they still have not said that "according to their reps" which is weird.<br /><br />I can't believe a rep. would give them that info and then turn around and deny it, it makes no sense, and I refuse to believe that friends of theirs would contact them, was it someone else associated working with the reps. at some level?<br /><br />And then Us magazine, their rival has the total opposite story with their reps. on record denying it .<br /><br />I would think that if it was over they would just instruct their reps to make a statement and be done with it. And it wasn't the case where it got out before it was suppose to, their reps are profesional and have been around too long to make a slip like that.<br /><br />And if it is false, then they need to find out who it is and find out why they would do something like that the week his movie was opening, it makes no sense and seems very unprofessional.<br /><br />Just my 2 centsChicanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-85478793308072276572009-12-09T19:00:14.058-05:002009-12-09T19:00:14.058-05:00i hope their still together too but im begining to...i hope their still together too but im begining to have my doubts too if true i would think their reps would make a statement if they have broken up maybe their just going thru a rough spell oh well well just have to wait and seemarynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-20773247154306045132009-12-09T18:46:30.308-05:002009-12-09T18:46:30.308-05:00About J&R.... I agree, UV.
Just my opinion, b...About J&R.... I agree, <b>UV</b>.<br /><br />Just my opinion, but I don't believe People would still be pushing this story unless they had a lot of confidence in the veracity of their source. Hope it's not true, but I'm not so sure now.....suveenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-28209406275704224462009-12-09T18:28:57.933-05:002009-12-09T18:28:57.933-05:00I agree, UV.I honestly don't believe they are ...I agree, UV.I honestly don't believe they are together any longer. Maybe they just want things to settle quietly so they can move on. They both seem to be the kind of people who would wish only the best for one another.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-244415733576362042009-12-09T18:23:12.825-05:002009-12-09T18:23:12.825-05:00Yes, thanks monica, BBM, DD and Zodiac are classic...Yes, thanks monica, BBM, DD and Zodiac are classics, and he isn't even 30 yet!<br /><br />I agree about J&R UV, I don't blame them for trying to avoid the paps and trying to go under the radar, but it's making thinks difficult for them even when they denied it through their reps.<br /><br />What they said and what Jake said at the press conference is enough for me, but they are looking for their $$$ shot,it reminds me of them in the beginning in 2007.<br /><br />For whatever reasons, they decided to go under the radar again after being so open IMO.Tweetynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-84885228019871211752009-12-09T17:55:54.657-05:002009-12-09T17:55:54.657-05:00The longer it goes that Jake and Reese are not see...The longer it goes that Jake and Reese are not seen together, the more people are going to speculate and the worse it looks for their relationship.<br /><br />Thanks for the link, Monica. Jake has been in some classic movies. And some very good ones. Not a bad resume so far!UltraViolethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09067526049573049270noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-72387049487313081932009-12-09T17:37:34.749-05:002009-12-09T17:37:34.749-05:00Thank you:).Thank you:).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-16849801948628601182009-12-09T17:33:31.584-05:002009-12-09T17:33:31.584-05:00Anon, 05:30:
PlaylistAnon, 05:30:<br /><a href="http://theplaylist.blogspot.com/2009/12/best-of-decade-playlists-best-films-of_09.html" rel="nofollow">Playlist</a>Monicahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08770238465259468762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-84442093160200021302009-12-09T17:30:53.061-05:002009-12-09T17:30:53.061-05:00Monica your link doesn't work.Monica your link doesn't work.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-91784318891709641742009-12-09T17:26:37.027-05:002009-12-09T17:26:37.027-05:00Someone noticed that Jake appeared in some of the ...Someone noticed that Jake appeared in some of the best films of the cinema?<br />Donnie Darko, Brokeback Mountain, Zodiac. Movies that will be remembered for a long time!<br /><br />Source Code may be next!<br /><br />Thanks for the script, FLMonicahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08770238465259468762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-52392761249768522082009-12-09T17:19:14.129-05:002009-12-09T17:19:14.129-05:00People have changed what they originally wrote, fi...People have changed what they originally wrote, first they said "may have ended, denied by reps" now they say "has ended according to a source". Wish they would make up their mind.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-35113188925076537392009-12-09T17:17:42.719-05:002009-12-09T17:17:42.719-05:00Best of The Decade: The Playlist's Best Films ...<a href="http://www.w3schools.com/" rel="nofollow">Best of The Decade: The Playlist's Best Films Of 2007</a> <br /><i>10. "Zodiac"<br />"Zodiac" is several films in one — it's a historical epic centered around the elusive serial killer in the Bay Area in the 1960s and '70s, when free-love turned to bloody cynicism; it's a thoughtful meditation on where media and murder intersect; it's an investigation into the pop culture of the time; and it's a damn fine detective story, with Mark Ruffalo as the dogged cop and Jake Gyllenhall as the newspaper cartoonist who carries on the investigative torch after everyone else has left it behind. (It's also a testament to technological advancement – this is one good-looking digital flick.) But one thing that never gets mentioned is how autobiographical it is. Director David Fincher is interested in depicting the depths of obsession precisely because that's how his brain works; cerebral indeed.</i>Monicahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08770238465259468762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-68780322335417428502009-12-09T16:57:09.975-05:002009-12-09T16:57:09.975-05:00boy people magazine is really harping on the jake/...boy people magazine is really harping on the jake/reese thing every time they are seen out by themselves they really make the most of it the other mags seem to be leaving them alone wish they would too but they have to sell magazinesmarynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5082978304655465192.post-52149584345323397562009-12-09T16:08:15.582-05:002009-12-09T16:08:15.582-05:00People magazine, bleh!
If there was a serious, fi...People magazine, bleh!<br /><br />If there was a serious, final break-up that left Jake hurting,<br />I doubt Maggie, or anyone else close to Jake,would be feeling very "close," to Reese. People and their sources know nothing. They invent.Just like the rest of them.<br />I don't believe they are truly broken up. Reese is not a dumb woman. LOL!bobbyannanoreply@blogger.com